In this paper I will explore the concept of I(i)nternational R(r)elations, hoping that I will eliminate the existent terminological confusion.

Along with the end of Cold War and the global Internet revolution, the concept of ‘international relations’ began to be used intensively in public space. It became so popular that passed academic debating borders or foreign policy news section. We see it used in the daily speech of ordinary people. If we write ‘international relations’ on Google, we receive more than two hundred thirty million results.

Those people who wanted a deeper and clearer understanding searched for a concept of ‘international relations.’ Soon they found themselves in the position to face several versions that caused a terminological confusion.

In this paper I will explore the concept of I(i)nternational R(r)elations, hoping that I will eliminate the existent terminological confusion. In so doing, in this paper I propose two versions and two meanings of the concept of I(i)nternational R(r)elations.